ppm Chlorine vs. ORP measurement

You probably know that some instruments use ORP to control chlorine dosing and others use ppm chlorine sensors but did you know that…

…ORP over about 3ppm won’t work? …swimming pools in the USA use ORP and in Europe use ppm chlorine sensors? …the ORP of towns water can vary a great deal?

In the USA nearly all pools and spas use ORP sensors to control their chlorine dose, yet conversely in the UK and Western Europe most ORP systems have been replaced with systems that measure the concentration of free chlorine in water. Pi provides systems that utilise either or both technologies.

ORP

Oxidation reduction potential (ORP or REDOX) sensors, measure the tendency of water to gain or lose electrons from anything in the water. The more positive a reading from an ORP the greater the tendency the water has to oxidise (gain electrons from) organisms or other material in the water, thereby killing or destroying them.

Why do so many pools in the USA use ORP?

When chlorine is dosed into a pool it forms OCl– and HOCl. Disinfection is largely done by the HOCl and ORP responds to the concentration of HOCl in the water, which makes it a good measure of the tendency of the chlorine in the water to kill bugs. Despite this, ORP is a secondary measure of HOCl and is affected by a multitude of other factors, some of which will be touched on below. The main attractions of ORP are; low purchase cost, no calibration and little or no maintenance.

What are the problems with ORP sensors?

Unfortunately, what ORP sensors measure is tendency and not capacity, i.e. ORP measures the likelihood or the ability of the water to kill bugs, but not how many bugs that water can kill, a subtle but very important difference. A sample with high ORP may be able to kill a small number of bugs very quickly but then not be able to kill future pollution. What’s more, although chlorine affects ORP very strongly it is not the only variable involved. The pH of water affects ORP directly and also affects the concentration ratio of OCl–/HOCl, the two main disinfectant components. A lower pH (higher acidity) will cause an increase in the relative concentrations of HOCl causing an increase in ORP.

Perhaps the biggest issue with ORP is that the ORP readings on water with no chlorine in it will be different depending on the source of that water. This means that an ORP of 750mV in one part of the country is not the same chlorine concentration as 750mV in another part of the country. Also, the ORP response to HOCl is not linear and increasing residual chlorine above 3 ppm has little effect on ORP readings making control above 3 ppm extremely difficult. These issues typically lead to overdosing the water with chlorine, in order to compensate for these effects. This can be seen very clearly in US pools which often have more than 2 ppm of chlorine compared to European pools which typically operate around 0.8-1.5 ppm (The World Health Organisation recommends 1 ppm residual).

ppm Chlorine

These sensors use electrochemistry to measure the free chlorine concentration directly. They tend to be slightly more expensive than an ORP sensor, but are more reproducible and precise, and therefore tend to give better control (and therefore reduced chemical cost).

They are specific to free chlorine (the disinfectant) and can be easily calibrated using a DPD test for free chlorine. Whilst the capital cost for a ppm chlorine sensor is higher, total cost of ownership tends to be lower as ORP sensors are typically replaced every year and ppm sensors last for ten years or more.

Problems with ppm Chlorine sensors

A ppm sensor measures the capacity of water to kill organisms, the only problem is that it doesn’t measure how fast the bugs are killed, a variable largely down to pH. There are two different types of ppm sensors. The first measure only HOCl and have very similar problems to ORP sensors. The other type of sensor, in pHs below 8.0, measure both HOCl and OCl–. Pi only recommends the use of sensors that (for use in pools) are independent of pH, and the use of pH control that is independent of chlorine dosage. This leads to tighter control of both pH and free chlorine meaning chlorine residuals can be more tightly controlled and reduced, which in turn leads to lower costs and a more pleasant bathing experience.

Conclusion

 

ORP SensorsORP Sensors
AdvantagesDisadvantages
  • Simple
  • No calibration
  • In expensive
  • Doesn’t measure disinfection capacity
  • Affected more by pH than chlorine
  • Non-linear
  • Leads to higher residuals and less stable control
  • Affected by changing water chemistry
Ppm SensorsPpm Sensors
AdvantagesDisadvantages
  • Measure free chlorine directly
  • Results are comparable across different sites
  • Linear response
  • Only affected by free chlorine
  • Leads to lower residuals, more stable control and better swimmer experience
  • Requires calibration
  • Slightly more expensive
  • Slightly more maintenance

Brochure Download

Please fill your details to download our brochure

Control Pump Details Download

Please fill your details to download tech details

Control Pumps Download

Thank you for your interest. Your download link is ready.

Please click on the button below to download now details.

Tech Note Download

Please fill your details to download our tech notes

TECH NOTE Download

Thank you for your interest. Your download link is ready.

Please click on the button below to download now tech details.

Brochure Download

Thank you for your interest. Your download link is ready.

Please click on the button below to download our brochure.

Brochure Download

Please fill your details to download our brochure

Brochure Download

Thank you for your interest. Your download link is ready.

Please click on the button below to download our brochure.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to browse on this website, you accept the use of cookies for the above purposes.